Within Military Denials
How Widely Did the Army Search for Chinooks?
The Army inquiry checked active-duty, National Guard and Reserve channels for helicopters linked to the reported formation.
On this page
- Why the case shifted from Air Force to Army
- Commands, facilities and local units contacted
- What the negative replies established
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
One of the most significant official enquiries in the Cash–Landrum incident was not an investigation into unidentified flying objects, but a narrowly defined search for the military helicopters that witnesses reported accompanying the luminous object. Once the aircraft descriptions pointed towards CH-47 Chinooks—an Army heavy-lift helicopter rather than an Air Force type—the Department of the Army Inspector General (DAIG) assumed responsibility for determining whether any Army, Army National Guard or Army Reserve aircraft could account for the reported formation. The resulting inquiry became an important piece of evidence because it systematically contacted the organisations most likely to have operated Chinooks in south-east Texas. Its conclusion was negative: investigators found no records or operational evidence placing Army helicopters at the reported location and time. That finding narrowed the range of plausible military explanations, but it did not independently explain what the witnesses observed.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
Why the investigation shifted from the Air Force to the Army
The Army Inspector General’s involvement followed a practical rather than speculative line of reasoning. Early enquiries through Air Force channels failed to identify any Air Force aircraft matching the witnesses’ descriptions. Because several witnesses described large tandem-rotor helicopters consistent with the CH-47 Chinook, responsibility naturally shifted towards the service that operated the overwhelming majority of those aircraft.
A memorandum attributed to Lieutenant Colonel George C. Sarran explains that the case reached the Department of the Army Inspector General because the Army possessed the “preponderance of troops and heavy equipment helicopters.” The inquiry therefore focused on one specific question: whether Army, Army National Guard or Army Reserve helicopters had participated in the reported event. The memorandum explicitly states that investigators were not tasked with determining whether a UFO existed or whether the reported medical effects had another cause.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
This distinction is important when assessing later claims. The DAIG investigation was designed as an ownership and flight-record enquiry, not as a comprehensive investigation into every aspect of the Cash–Landrum incident.
Commands, facilities and local units contacted
Rather than relying on a single headquarters, the Army Inspector General attempted to eliminate the most plausible military sources one by one.
According to the surviving memorandum, investigators first established the reported location—approximately 35 miles north-east of Houston near Dayton, Texas—and the reported time of approximately 2100–2130 hours on 29 December 1980. They also noted that the incident occurred during the Christmas–New Year holiday period, when Army flying activity was generally expected to be limited unless specific exercises were underway.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
The enquiry then requested flight-record checks from a broad cross-section of Army organisations involved in operations, aviation, training, testing and logistics. These included:
- Forces Command (FORSCOM).[army.mil]army.milu s army forces command completes investigation of fort hood leader actionsArmy Forces Command completes investigation of Fort Hood leader actionsApril 30, 2021 — U.S. ARMY FORCES COMMAND COMPLETES INVESTIGATION…
- Operations and Reserve Training offices.[army]army.milu s army forces command completes investigation of fort hood leader actionsArmy Forces Command completes investigation of Fort Hood leader actionsApril 30, 2021 — U.S. ARMY FORCES COMMAND COMPLETES INVESTIGATION… my Aviation Command elements.
- DARCOM Inspector General offices and aviation programme managers.
- Test and Evaluation Command (TECOM).
- Operational Test and Evaluation Agency (OTEA). * Fort Hood Inspector General.[army.mil]army.milu s army forces command completes investigation of fort hood leader actionsArmy Forces Command completes investigation of Fort Hood leader actionsApril 30, 2021 — U.S. ARMY FORCES COMMAND COMPLETES INVESTIGATION… * Aviation organisations associated with Fort Hood.[army.mil]army.milSource details in endnotes.
- The Army aviation repair facility at Corpus Christi.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
The search also extended beyond headquarters to local operators most likely to possess Chinooks or other Army helicopters in the region.
Investigators coordinated with:
- NASA’s project director for manned flight operations, John Schuessler’s local professional contact network.
- The commander responsible for eight Texas Army National Guard CH-47 Chinooks stationed at Ellington Air Force Base near Houston.
- The senior Army Reserve aviation adviser responsible for seven UH-1 Huey helicopters based at Tomball, north-west of Houston.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
This breadth is noteworthy because it covered all three organisational categories identified in the investigation’s mandate: active Army units, Army National Guard aviation and Army Reserve aviation.
Why local aviation units mattered
The local National Guard and Reserve enquiries were especially important because they addressed one of the strongest alternative explanations.
Unlike active-duty Army aviation, National Guard aircraft may operate from state facilities while remaining federally owned and capable of federal activation. Similarly, Reserve aviation units conduct regular training flights that are separate from active-duty formations. If numerous helicopters had originated from a nearby military installation, these organisations represented some of the most likely candidates to possess relevant flight logs.
The inquiry therefore did not merely ask whether Fort Hood had aircraft in the area. It attempted to determine whether any Army-operated Chinooks or supporting helicopters from the surrounding region had records placing them near the reported location that evening.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
What the negative replies established
After allowing time for units to review their records, the Inspector General reported that all helicopter enquiries concerning known flying activity in the relevant area were negative. No participating Army organisation identified flight records matching the reported location, time or scale of the alleged helicopter formation.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
This negative result established several evidential points:
- It reduced the likelihood that the reported helicopters belonged to routine Army training operations.
- It found no support for the idea that Army National Guard Chinooks from Ellington had conducted the reported mission.
- It found no evidence that nearby Army Reserve helicopter units accounted for the sightings.
- It identified no scheduled Army manoeuvres in the area during the relevant holiday period.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
Importantly, these findings are stronger than a simple statement that “the Army denied involvement.” They represent the outcome of an identifiable records search conducted across the organisations most likely to have operated CH-47 aircraft in the region.
What the investigation did not prove
The Army Inspector General’s conclusions have sometimes been interpreted more broadly than the evidence supports.
The investigation did not conclude that witnesses fabricated the helicopters, nor did it determine what object the witnesses observed. Instead, it concluded that investigators could not connect the reported helicopters to known Army, Army National Guard or Army Reserve operations through available records.
Those are different propositions. A negative records search demonstrates an absence of corroborating military documentation within the organisations examined. It does not logically establish that no helicopters of any kind were present, nor does it identify an alternative explanation for multiple independent reports of heavy-lift helicopters. The distinction is especially relevant because the investigation’s own mandate was intentionally limited to identifying possible Army aircraft rather than resolving every aspect of the Cash–Landrum incident.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
How the Army search fits into the wider ownership question
Within the broader question of military ownership and agency boundaries, the Army Inspector General enquiry represents the government’s most comprehensive attempt to determine whether reported Chinooks belonged to Army-controlled aviation.
Its practical value lies less in proving what happened than in documenting what investigators actually checked. By extending enquiries beyond the Air Force and into active-duty, National Guard and Reserve aviation channels, the investigation addressed the services most likely to have operated CH-47 helicopters in south-east Texas. The absence of matching flight records therefore became meaningful negative evidence: it weakened a conventional Army aviation explanation without independently resolving the witnesses’ account of the incident.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to How Widely Did the Army Search for Chinooks?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Chickenhawk
Robert Mason's bestselling account of his service as a chopper pilot in Vietnam--a no-holds-barred autobiography that reveals the war's s...
Black Hawk Down
Rating: 4.0/5 from 21 Google Books ratings
The story of the American military battle in Somalia on October 3, 1993.
We Were Soldiers Once . . . and Young
New York Times Bestseller: A “powerful and epic story . . . the best account of infantry combat I have ever read” (Col. David Hackworth,...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromChinook patch oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: army.mil
Title: completes review of May 1 DCA flight event | Article | The United States Army
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/285785/army_completes_review_of_may_1_dca_flight_event
Source snippet
Army completes review of May 1 DCA flight event | Article | The United States ArmyMay 23, 2025 — ARMY COMPLETES REVIEW OF MAY 1 DCA FLIGH...
Published: May 23, 2025
2.
Source: army.mil
Title: u s army forces command completes investigation of fort hood leader actions
Link:https://www.army.mil/article-amp/245804/u_s_army_forces_command_completes_investigation_of_fort_hood_leader_actions
Source snippet
Army Forces Command completes investigation of Fort Hood leader actionsApril 30, 2021 — U.S. ARMY FORCES COMMAND COMPLETES INVESTIGATION...
Published: April 30, 2021
3.
Source: army.mil
Link:https://www.army.mil/article-amp/245224/army_investigation_into_june_1st_d_c_national_guard_helicopter_usage_uncovered_organizational_resource_and_oversight_shortcomings
4.
Source: ig.army.mil
Link:https://ig.army.mil/REQUEST-IG-ACTION/Request-Army-IG-Action/
5.
Source: usar.army.mil
Link:https://www.usar.army.mil/LocateIG/
6.
Source: army.mil
Link:https://www.army.mil/ig
7.
Source: usar.army.mil
Link:https://www.usar.army.mil/FilingwithIG/
8.
Source: jtfncr.mdw.army.mil
Link:https://jtfncr.mdw.army.mil/Resources/Inspector-General/IG-Action-Request-Form/
9.
Source: ig.army.mil
Link:https://ig.army.mil/
10.
Source: usar.army.mil
Link:https://www.usar.army.mil/USAR-IG/
11.
Source: hrc.army.mil
Link:https://www.hrc.army.mil/content/iPERMS%20Access
12.
Source: ig.army.mil
Link:https://ig.army.mil/FOIA/
13.
Source: il.ngb.army.mil
Link:https://www.il.ngb.army.mil/Servicemember-Resources/Inspector-General-IG-in-process/
14.
Source: foia.army.mil
Link:https://foia.army.mil/Home/publicRecords/52
15.
Source: army.mil
Link:https://www.army.mil/forthoodreview/
16.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Cash
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6sV0LIy7GI
Source snippet
The UFO Cases Governments Couldn't Explain | Close Encounters...
17.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/cashlandrumsarran01.htm
Source snippet
UFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran...
18.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://www.ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/cashlandrumpetergersten.htm
Additional References
19.
Source: scribd.com
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/505621662/Guillen-Fort-Hood-Investigation-Findings-and-Recommendations-CG-Action-Memo-Redacted-Redacted-29-Apr-21
Source snippet
Fort Hood Investigation: Vanessa Guillén | PDF | Military | National SecurityApril 29, 2021 — The investigation examined Fort Hood's resp...
Published: April 29, 2021
20.
Source: thisunexplaineduniverse.com
Link:https://www.thisunexplaineduniverse.com/articles/cash-landrum-incident
Source snippet
The Cash-Landrum Incident: The UFO That Left [Medical Records]({{ 'medical-record/' | relative_url }}) | This Unexplained UniverseJuly 28, 2026 — A NASA ENGINEER TAKES THE CASE Th...
Published: July 28, 2026
21.
Source: blueblurrylines.com
Title: It took almost two months for it to surface, but two w
Link:https://www.blueblurrylines.com/search/label/Government%20UFO%20file
Source snippet
Blue Blurry Lines: Government UFO fileDecember 14, 2022 — 1980s and the Cash-Landrum UFO Investigation In the spring of 1981, news covera...
Published: December 14, 2022
22.
Source: stripes.com
Title: Thayer Rose L. Thayer Stars and Stripes •
Link:https://www.stripes.com/branches/army/2025-12-10/inspector-general-review-fort-hood-doctor-20049907.html
Source snippet
Army, its Inspector General to review medical policies following criminal charges against Fort Hood doctor | Stars and StripesDecember 10...
23.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Did Aliens Cause This Family Health Problems? | Cash-Landrum Incident
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFz7hXTJDkU
Source snippet
Top 10 Scariest UFO Encounters Ever Recorded | Ancient Aliens...
24.
Source: blueblurrylines.com
Link:https://www.blueblurrylines.com/2013/11/the-daig-investigation-of-cash-landrum.html
25.
Source: arkansas.nationalguard.mil
Link:https://arkansas.nationalguard.mil/Home/Inspector-General/
26.
Source: armed-services.senate.gov
Title: inhofe reed statement on fort hood independent review committee report
Link:https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/press-releases/inhofe-reed-statement-on-fort-hood-independent-review-committee-report
27.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Cash-Landrum UFO Mystery
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2HsOUTzyWA
Source snippet
Did Aliens Cause This Family Health Problems? | Cash-Landrum Incident...
28.
Source: armed-services.senate.gov
Title: reed and inhofe statement on fort hood briefing
Link:https://www.armed-services.senate.gov/press-releases/reed-and-inhofe-statement-on-fort-hood-briefing