Within Cash Landrum
Were Dozens of Chinooks Really Following the Object?
The report of roughly 23 tandem-rotor helicopters is the case's strongest suggestion of military involvement and its largest evidential gap.
On this page
- How the helicopter count developed
- Aircraft identification and military markings
- The missing operational record
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The claim that roughly 23 military helicopters followed the object is the strongest apparent sign of government involvement in the Cash–Landrum incident—and also its largest evidential gap. Betty Cash said she counted 23 aircraft; Vickie Landrum reportedly gave a figure of 26. Several were described as tandem-rotor helicopters and were later identified from silhouettes as CH-47 Chinooks. Yet no photograph, radar return, flight log, unit order, named crew member or contemporary independent report has established that such a formation flew near Huffman, Texas, on 29 December 1980.
That leaves an unusually sharp divide between significance and proof. A flight of more than 20 heavy military helicopters would represent a major operation, not an incidental sighting. It should have involved many personnel, substantial fuel and maintenance support, airspace coordination and extensive noise. The witnesses’ account cannot simply be dismissed because those records have not surfaced, but neither can the absence of records be treated as evidence that they were concealed.
How the helicopter count developed
The familiar figure of 23 comes most clearly from the witnesses’ recorded interview at Bergstrom Air Force Base on 17 August 1981, nearly eight months after the incident. Cash told Air Force legal officers that helicopters were “completely around the object” and that she counted 23 after driving farther along the road and stopping. She added that Landrum counted 26, acknowledging that neither number should be regarded as exact.[Ufology News]ufology-news.comUfology News Transcript, Cash-Landrum InterviewUfology NewsTranscript, Cash-Landrum InterviewJune 9, 2002 — Transcript, Cash-Landrum Interview TRANSCRIPT OF BERGSTROM AFB INTERVIEW OF…
That testimony matters because the count was not presented as a quick impression of a few lights. Cash described a deliberate attempt to enumerate aircraft after the most frightening part of the encounter. Even so, several factors limit its precision. The observation occurred at night, apparently while the helicopters and object were moving, and the witnesses were distressed. Some aircraft may have been counted twice as they changed position, while others may have been obscured. “About 23” is therefore better understood as a claim of a very large formation than as a verified inventory.
The wording also changed as the story was retold. Later summaries frequently state that 23 CH-47 Chinooks escorted the object, but the primary interview is more cautious: Cash said some helicopters had “two rotors”, while the Army Inspector General’s memorandum stated that only some were identified as CH-47s through comparison with aircraft silhouettes. The source material therefore supports “roughly two dozen helicopters, including aircraft thought to be Chinooks”, not the stronger claim that all 23 were positively identified CH-47s.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
This distinction is important because tandem-rotor configuration is conspicuous but not unique to the Chinook family. The United States also operated the smaller CH-46 Sea Knight, chiefly with the Navy and Marine Corps, although its proportions differ. At night, with limited viewing time and bright lights nearby, recognition of “two large rotors” is more secure than recognition of a particular model.
Aircraft identification and military markings
The CH-47 identification is plausible at a broad visual level. The Chinook is a large, twin-engine, tandem-rotor transport helicopter developed for the US Army, with a long fuselage and one rotor mounted near each end. Its silhouette is markedly different from conventional helicopters with one main rotor and a tail rotor. The Army was the principal American operator, and the type was well established in service by 1980.[Odin]odin.t2com.army.milOdin ODINGOVERNMENT (USG) INFORMATION SYSTEM (IS). ALL CONTENT PROVIDED ON THIS SITE IS DISTRIBUTION: A, APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. Confirm CH-4…
The identification becomes less secure when the alleged markings are considered. During the Bergstrom interview, Cash said the helicopters bore the words “United States Air Force”. That is difficult to reconcile with the aircraft type: a sworn Air Force affidavit later filed in the civil case stated that the CH-47 was not in the US Air Force inventory on or around 29 December 1980.[Ufology News]ufology-news.comUfology News Transcript, Cash-Landrum InterviewUfology NewsTranscript, Cash-Landrum InterviewJune 9, 2002 — Transcript, Cash-Landrum Interview TRANSCRIPT OF BERGSTROM AFB INTERVIEW OF…
This discrepancy has several possible explanations, none of which can now be demonstrated. Cash may have seen a generic national marking and reconstructed the service name later; she may have misread lettering in darkness; the aircraft may not have been CH-47s; or different helicopter types may have been present. The inconsistency does not prove fabrication, but it weakens any claim that the witnesses made a detailed, service-level identification at the scene.
The Army’s own inquiry reflected this uncertainty. Lieutenant Colonel George Sarran’s memorandum said the case had been passed from the Air Force because the Army possessed most of the relevant heavy helicopters. It described the CH-47 conclusion as arising through a later “process of identifying silhouettes”, rather than from a recorded tail number, unit badge or unmistakable marking observed during the event.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
That process carries a familiar identification risk: once investigators present a witness with candidate silhouettes, recognition can become partly reconstructive. A witness may sincerely choose the closest match without having retained enough detail to exclude similar aircraft. The conclusion that some helicopters resembled Chinooks is therefore reasonable; the conclusion that a specific Army CH-47 unit was present requires evidence that the case has never produced.
Did anyone else see the formation?
Later investigators reported limited supporting testimony. Dayton police patrolman Lamar Walker and his wife were interviewed in 1982 and said they had seen approximately 12 tandem-rotor or Chinook-type helicopters in the wider area on the same night. They did not report seeing the principal object, although they described a bright light shining from at least one helicopter. This account is potentially important because it came from people outside the Cash–Landrum party, but it was collected well after the incident and does not appear to have been documented in a contemporary police log or night-of-event statement.[Wikipedia]WikipediaCash–Landrum incidentThe Cash–Landrum Incident was an unidentified flying object sighting in the United States in 1980, which witnesses c…
That makes the Walker report corroborative in only a limited sense. It supports the possibility that unusual helicopter activity occurred somewhere in the area, but it does not independently confirm a formation of 23 aircraft surrounding the object at the time and place described by Cash and Landrum. The timing, route, viewing distance and exact aircraft count were not fixed by objective records.
Other later helicopter stories are still weaker. One frequently repeated episode involved Landrum speaking to a Chinook pilot who supposedly acknowledged an earlier mission connected with a UFO near Huffman. Subsequent examination indicated that the pilot was referring to a different event in 1977, not the December 1980 encounter. It cannot be used as an admission by a participating crew member.[Wikipedia]WikipediaCash–Landrum incidentThe Cash–Landrum Incident was an unidentified flying object sighting in the United States in 1980, which witnesses c…
The evidential pattern is therefore uneven: three principal witnesses described numerous helicopters, and at least one later household account may support regional helicopter activity. What is missing is the type of independent, time-stamped corroboration expected from such a conspicuous operation—emergency calls, newspaper reports from the following day, air-traffic records, photographs, multiple unrelated witness statements or identifiable military personnel.
The missing operational record
Sarran’s Army Inspector General inquiry was narrower than later retellings sometimes imply. It did not investigate whether the object existed, what caused the witnesses’ illnesses or whether every component of the encounter occurred. Its purpose was to determine whether Army, Army National Guard or Army Reserve helicopters had been involved.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
The inquiry contacted a wide range of commands and facilities, including Forces Command, Fort Hood, Army aviation organisations, the Corpus Christi repair facility, the Texas National Guard Chinook detachment at Ellington Air Force Base and an Army Reserve helicopter unit at Tomball. According to Sarran, checks of available flight records produced no known helicopter activity in the relevant area and period. He also noted that no manoeuvres were scheduled and that military flying was generally limited during the holiday period.[Ufologie]ufologie.patrickgross.orgUFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran…
This was a meaningful search, but not an absolute demonstration that no military aircraft flew. The investigation began long after the alleged event, when routine records may already have been difficult to retrieve. Its memorandum does not reproduce every unit’s underlying flight log, identify every record custodian or establish that classified and special-operations channels were exhaustively checked. A negative administrative inquiry is stronger than a casual denial, but weaker than a complete, independently auditable reconstruction.
Even with that limitation, the scale of the claim creates a serious practical problem. Twenty-three CH-47-class helicopters would require dozens of pilots and crew members and probably involve several organisational elements. The aircraft would need dispatch, maintenance and fuel records; commanders would have to authorise or at least account for their movement; and a mass low-level flight near populated areas would be exceptionally loud. Modern reports of formations far smaller than 23 Chinooks describe conspicuous noise, vibration and public attention, illustrating how difficult an operation of the claimed size would be to conduct unnoticed.[San Antonio Express-News]expressnews.comThe military confirmed the helicopters were part of a training exercise conducted by Fort Campbell, Kentucky, likely involving the elite…
The absence of a matching operational trail does not logically rule out every possibility. Records can be incomplete, units can operate under unusual authority, and witnesses may have seen fewer aircraft than they believed. But the larger and more specific the formation claim becomes, the harder it is to explain the total lack of crews, documents and contemporaneous civilian reaction.
What the lawsuit established—and did not establish
The helicopter allegation helped drive the witnesses’ attempt to hold the federal government liable. Their claims were denied administratively in 1983 on the ground that the investigation had found no evidence of involvement by US military personnel, equipment or aircraft. The letter expressly said that accepting and considering the claim was not an admission that the alleged facts were true.[Gary P. Posner]gpposner.comGary P. Posner
The subsequent federal action was dismissed in 1986. Government affidavits stated that the unidentified object was not owned, operated or held in the aircraft inventories of the named agencies. The Air Force affidavit separately confirmed that it did not operate the CH-47 at the relevant time. The court’s dismissal therefore reflected failure to establish governmental responsibility, not a judicial finding that the witnesses saw no helicopters or invented the encounter.[Gary P. Posner]gpposner.comGary P. Posner
Conversely, the litigation did not validate the formation. No helicopter unit was identified through discovery, no military witness testified to participation and no operational document emerged. The legal record shows that the allegation was taken far enough to prompt affidavits and official denials; it does not convert the allegation into proven military activity.
How strong is the Chinook claim?
The most defensible assessment separates three propositions that are often merged:
- The witnesses reported many helicopters. This is well documented in their 1981 Air Force interview and later case records.
- Some aircraft appeared to have tandem rotors and resembled CH-47s. This is plausible but dependent on night-time observation and later silhouette identification.
- A formation of approximately 23 US military Chinooks escorted or pursued the object. This remains unverified and faces substantial documentary and logistical objections.
The helicopter testimony remains compelling because it is concrete, unusual and potentially testable. Unlike a vague distant light, a mass formation of identifiable military aircraft ought to connect the incident to organisations, bases, crews and records. Precisely because it should be testable, the continued absence of those connections is damaging.
The fairest conclusion is not that the Chinooks were disproved, nor that their missing records reveal a cover-up. It is that the witnesses consistently described a large helicopter presence, probably including aircraft they understood to be tandem-rotor military types, while the exact count, model identification, service markings and operational origin remain unsupported. In the Cash–Landrum case, the helicopters are simultaneously the clearest proposed link to the US military and the point at which the evidence most conspicuously fails to close.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Were Dozens of Chinooks Really Following the Object?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the Re...
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
The UFO Experience: A Scientific Inquiry
Cited by the New York Review of Books as "the best brief for visitation," this classic study presents an analysis of UFO reports and conc...
Dimensions
Throughout the modern UFO era, thousands of honest scientists and informed laymen have seen through the official denials, the suppression...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromChinook helicopter poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: ufology-news.com
Title: Ufology News Transcript, Cash-Landrum Interview
Link:https://ufology-news.com/u/18672430/Ufology_News/The_Cash-Landrum_Incident_-_Transcript_of_Bergstrom_AFB.pdf
Source snippet
Ufology NewsTranscript, Cash-Landrum InterviewJune 9, 2002 — Transcript, Cash-Landrum Interview TRANSCRIPT OF BERGSTROM AFB INTERVIEW OF...
Published: June 9, 2002
2.
Source: odin.t2com.army.mil
Title: Odin ODIN
Link:https://odin.t2com.army.mil/WEG/Asset/3ff350b028b30c0d30473c7a7d3c2fa8
Source snippet
GOVERNMENT (USG) INFORMATION SYSTEM (IS). ALL CONTENT PROVIDED ON THIS SITE IS DISTRIBUTION: A, APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. Confirm CH-4...
3.
Source: army.mil
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/137584/CH_47_CHINOOK_HELICOPTER/
Source snippet
Army November 4, 2014 1 / 6 Show Caption + (Photo Credit: U.S. Army) VIEW ORIGINAL MISSION Supports a fu...
Published: November 4, 2014
4.
Source: Wikipedia
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cash%E2%80%93Landrum_incident
Source snippet
Cash–Landrum incidentThe Cash–Landrum Incident was an unidentified flying object sighting in the United States in 1980, which witnesses c...
5.
Source: gpposner.com
Title: Gary P. Posner
Link:https://gpposner.com/CL-Schuessler_book_pp.197%2C222%2C300%2C302.pdf
6.
Source: army.mil
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/293169/transition_to_the_future_pm_cargo_delivers_final_ch_47f_block_i_shifts_focus_to_block_ii_production
7.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: org2nd Battalion, 227th Aviation Regiment
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2nd_Battalion%2C_227th_Aviation_Regiment
8.
Source: army.mil
Title: The Chinook in LSCO | Article | The United States Army
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/288976/the_chinook_in_lsco
9.
Source: army.mil
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/288833/army_accelerates_capability_to_the_force_with_a_rapid_fielding_effort_for_chinook_block_ii
10.
Source: army.mil
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/194537/despite_failures_winged_chinook_experiment_led_to_army_aviation_fleet_improvements
11.
Source: asc.army.mil
Title: mil Army Chinook Helicopter to Fly for 100 Years
Link:https://asc.army.mil/web/news-army-chinook-helicopter-to-fly-for-100-years/
12.
Source: army.mil
Title: Chinook marks 50 years of service | Article | The United States Army
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/66213/chinook_marks_50_years_of_service
13.
Source: army.mil
Title: Chinook turns 50, looks toward future | Article | The United States Army
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/65943/chinook_turns_50_looks_toward_future
14.
Source: army.mil
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/65273/25th_cab_and_hng_introduce_ch_47f_chinooks_helicopters_to_their_fleet
15.
Source: lists.army.mil
Title: mil Stand-To!- Cargo Helicopter
Link:https://www.lists.army.mil/pipermail/stand-to/2007-May/000339.html
16.
Source: army.mil
Title: Chinook Fact File | Article | The United States Army
Link:https://www.army.mil/article/1735/chinook_fact_file
17.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: org158th Aviation Regiment
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/158th_Aviation_Regiment
18.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/cashlandrumsarran01.htm
Source snippet
UFOs at close sight: the Cash-Landrum case, 1980, USAF memo 1/4, Sarran...
19.
Source: expressnews.com
Link:https://www.expressnews.com/news/article/military-helicopters-chinooks-iran-war-san-antonio-21954992.php
Source snippet
The military confirmed the helicopters were part of a training exercise conducted by Fort Campbell, Kentucky, likely involving the elite...
20.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/cashlandrumint01.htm
22.
Source: ufologie.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufologie.patrickgross.org/htm/cashlandrumint02.htm
23.
Source: ufology.patrickgross.org
Link:https://ufology.patrickgross.org/htm/cashlandrumsarran01.htm
Additional References
24.
Source: whipnet.com
Title: UFO.Whipnet.org | Aliens | UFO | The Piney Woods UFO
Link:https://www.whipnet.com/sites/ufo.whipnet.org/xdocs/Cash.Landrum/trans1.html
Source snippet
Aliens | UFO | The Piney Woods UFO - Transcript 1UFO.Whipnet.org | Aliens | UFO | The Piney Woods UFO - Transcript 1 Documents Photos R...
25.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TiYo1kdnk8I
Source snippet
The Cash-Landrum incident: traumatized & physically ill after terrifying UFO encounter, Dec 29, 1980...
26.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Betty Cash, Vickie and [Colby Landrum]({{ ‘colby-landrum/’ | relative_url }}) on witnessing a fiery diamond-shaped UFO,
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UJdhk3_DurE
Source snippet
Rare 25-minute interview with Vickie and Colby Landrum on the [Cash-Landrum UFO incident]({{ 'cash-landrum-ufo-incident/' | relative_url }}), 1980...
Published: December 29, 1980
27.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJR6RepzUvk
Source snippet
Cash Landrum UFO helicopters Chinook The Cash-Landrum incident: traumatized & physically ill after terrifying UFO encounter, Dec 29, 1980...
28.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Cash-Landrum Incident: 23 Helicopters and a Deadly UFO
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0r5par-v67w
Source snippet
Betty Cash, Vickie and Colby Landrum on witnessing a fiery diamond-shaped UFO, December 29, 1980...
Published: December 29, 1980
29.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KiCgBn-Kbho
Source snippet
1980-12-29: The Cash-Landrum UFO Incident...
30.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/opa/pr/2000/August/450civ.htm
31.
Source: cufon.org
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/cashlani2.htm
32.
Source: blueblurrylines.com
Link:https://www.blueblurrylines.com/2013/11/the-daig-investigation-of-cash-landrum.html
33.
Source: projectblackecho.com
Link:https://www.projectblackecho.com/incidents/close-encounters/cash-landrum-close-encounter