Within Claims Process
Why the Claims Waited Nearly Two Years
The claims were signed nearly two years after the encounter, close to the stated deadline and only after a civilian lawyer assembled supporting records.
On this page
- The gap between the encounter and filing
- The deadline shown on the claim forms
- Peter Gersten's role in completing the submission
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The compensation claims arising from the Cash–Landrum incident were not filed immediately after the alleged encounter of 29 December 1980. Instead, Betty Cash, Vickie Landrum and Colby Landrum submitted formal administrative claims to the U.S. Air Force in December 1982, almost two years later. That delay has often been portrayed as suspicious or inexplicable, but the surviving administrative record points to a more procedural explanation. The witnesses spent much of 1981 attempting to identify the correct government office, gathering medical documentation and learning how claims against the federal government had to be presented. Only after civilian attorney Peter Gersten assembled the supporting material were the claims submitted shortly before the apparent two-year filing deadline imposed by the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA).[blueblurrylines.com]blueblurrylines.comBlue Blurry LinesBlue Blurry LinesDecember 28, 2025…
The Gap Between the Encounter and Filing
The nearly two-year interval was not a period of inactivity. Before filing formal compensation claims, the witnesses pursued several less formal avenues.
Following the reported encounter, Betty Cash sought assistance from members of Congress rather than immediately beginning legal proceedings. Correspondence from Texas senators directed her to the Judge Advocate’s office at Bergstrom Air Force Base, where Air Force legal officers interviewed the witnesses in August 1981 and explained the administrative claims process. That interview produced information about how to pursue compensation, but it did not itself constitute a formal damages claim.
The Air Force officers also advised the witnesses that they were government lawyers rather than private counsel and suggested consulting a civilian attorney before completing the necessary paperwork. That recommendation became important because a valid FTCA claim required considerably more than simply reporting an unusual incident. It had to identify the claimant, describe the alleged government responsibility and request a specific monetary amount.[cufon.org]cufon.orgOther Files" DirectoryCUFON "Other Files" Directory…
Why December 1982 Became the Critical Moment
The timing of the filing closely matched the legal framework governing federal tort claims.
Under the FTCA, an administrative claim generally must be presented to the responsible federal agency within two years after the claim accrues. Failure to meet that deadline normally bars any later lawsuit. Courts have consistently treated this requirement as a fundamental prerequisite to litigation against the United States.[justia.com]law.justia.comMary L. Wardsworth, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 721 F.2d 503 (5th Cir. 1983):: Justia…
Because the Cash–Landrum incident occurred on 29 December 1980, a filing in December 1982 placed the claims just inside that apparent statutory window. The surviving record therefore suggests that the witnesses were working against a legal deadline rather than choosing an arbitrary filing date.
The timing also explains why the administrative claims became such an important procedural milestone. Without first presenting those claims to the Air Force, the later federal lawsuit could not proceed under the FTCA.[Justia]law.justia.comMary L. Wardsworth, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 721 F.2d 503 (5th Cir. 1983):: Justia…
Peter Gersten’s Role in Completing the Submission
The formal claims were submitted only after attorney Peter Gersten became involved.
Gersten, already known for representing clients in UFO-related matters, helped organise the material into formal compensation demands. Contemporary accounts and later case summaries consistently describe him as the lawyer who prepared and filed the administrative claims on behalf of the three witnesses in December 1982. Those claims sought substantial monetary compensation for alleged physical injuries and related losses, supported by medical records and witness documentation assembled over the preceding months.[Blue Blurry Lines]blueblurrylines.comBlue Blurry LinesBlue Blurry LinesDecember 28, 2025…
His involvement also addressed a practical problem identified during the Bergstrom meeting. Air Force officials had explained the procedural requirements but could not act as the claimants’ legal advisers. A private attorney therefore became responsible for transforming witness statements and medical evidence into legally sufficient administrative claims.
Delay Does Not Necessarily Indicate Doubt
The late filing has sometimes been interpreted as evidence that the witnesses lacked confidence in their account. The administrative record supports a more limited conclusion.
Several practical factors help explain the elapsed time:
- Identifying the correct process. The witnesses initially pursued congressional assistance before learning that the Air Force claims system was the appropriate administrative route.
- Collecting supporting records. Medical documentation and other evidence had to be assembled before presenting substantial personal injury claims.
- Obtaining legal representation. The Air Force itself recommended consulting private counsel, and the claims were ultimately completed after Peter Gersten became involved.
- Meeting procedural requirements. FTCA claims required a properly completed submission, including a specific monetary demand rather than a general complaint. Courts have repeatedly held that incomplete filings can fail to satisfy the statute.[justia.com]law.justia.comMary L. Wardsworth, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 721 F.2d 503 (5th Cir. 1983):: Justia…
None of these factors establishes whether the underlying allegations were true or false. Instead, they explain why the administrative paperwork appeared relatively late despite the witnesses having contacted government officials much earlier.
What the Filing Delay Meant for the Administrative Case
The December 1982 submissions marked the transition from an informal search for answers to a legally defined compensation claim.
By filing just before the apparent two-year deadline, the claimants preserved the procedural possibility of bringing an FTCA lawsuit if the Air Force rejected their demands. The subsequent litigation ultimately failed because the courts concluded there was insufficient evidence that the United States was responsible for the alleged aircraft or injuries, not because the administrative claims had been filed too late. The filing delay therefore became significant primarily as a procedural feature of the case rather than as evidence about the underlying incident itself.[scribd.com]scribd.comFederal Tort Claims Act CaseFederal Tort Claims Act Case Summary | PDF | Lawsuit | Diseases And Disorders…
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why the Claims Waited Nearly Two Years. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Federal Jurisdiction
This premier treatise offers a powerful exploration of the underlying polices and the doctrine of federal jurisdiction. Erwin Chemerinsky...
Administrative Law and Regulatory Policy
Help your students master the principles of administrative law in an era of change with this new edition of the renowned casebook ADMINIS...
The Winning Brief
Good legal writing wins court cases. It its first edition, The Winning Brief proved that the key to writing well is understanding the jud...
Legal Research in a Nutshell
Finding and using legal resources effectively is an essential skill for lawyers. This comprehensive but succinct guide covers major Inter...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/721/503/162420/
Source snippet
Mary L. Wardsworth, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee, 721 F.2d 503 (5th Cir. 1983):: Justia...
2.
Source: cufon.org
Title: “Other Files” Directory
Link:https://www.cufon.org/cufon/cufon-o.htm
Source snippet
CUFON "Other Files" Directory...
3.
Source: scribd.com
Title: Federal Tort Claims Act Case
Link:https://www.scribd.com/document/908709170/126065-r
Source snippet
Federal Tort Claims Act Case Summary | PDF | Lawsuit | Diseases And Disorders...
4.
Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/883/1023/350297/
5.
Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/850/532/3379/
6.
Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/762/1006/406383/
7.
Source: law.justia.com
Link:https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/F2/737/666/233089/
8.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Cash
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t6sV0LIy7GI
Source snippet
[Cash-Landrum UFO Incident]({{ 'cash-landrum-ufo-incident/' | relative_url }})...
9.
Source: youtube.com
Title: FTCA Claim Filing Process — Step by Step Breakdown of an FTCA Claim
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrUJeip10SM
Source snippet
Federal Tort Claims Act...
10.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Federal Tort Claims Act
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QRS2iLPsdHA
11.
Source: blueblurrylines.com
Link:https://www.blueblurrylines.com/
Source snippet
Blue Blurry LinesBlue Blurry LinesDecember 28, 2025...
Published: December 28, 2025
12.
Source: legalclarity.org
Title: Legal Clarity Standard Form 95: How to File an FTCA Claim
Link:https://legalclarity.org/how-to-file-a-standard-form-95-for-federal-tort-claims/
Source snippet
Legal ClarityStandard Form 95: How to File an FTCA Claim - LegalClarity...
13.
Source: wikidisc.org
Title: Cash–Landrum incident | Wiki Disc
Link:https://www.wikidisc.org/wiki/Cash%E2%80%93Landrum_incident
Source snippet
Cash–Landrum incident | WikiDiscJuly 1, 2026 — CASH–LANDRUM INCIDENT [Input] Add languages Add links * Page * Discussion [Input] English...
Published: July 1, 2026
Additional References
14.
Source: nolo.com
Link:https://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/suing-government-negligence-FTCA-29705.html?version=control
Source snippet
How to Sue the Federal Government Under The FTCAJuly 16, 2026 — FILING AN ADMINISTRATIVE CLAIM When your injury claim is against a privat...
Published: July 16, 2026
15.
Source: discoveryuk.com
Title: Highway Encounter: The Cash-Landrum Incident
Link:https://www.discoveryuk.com/mysteries/highway-encounter-the-cash-landrum-incident/
Source snippet
Discovery UKApril 14, 2026 — THE OFFICIAL LINE ImageImage The official line was that there were no USAF helicopters in the area that nigh...
Published: April 14, 2026
16.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Did Aliens Cause This Family Health Problems? | Cash-Landrum Incident
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cFz7hXTJDkU
Source snippet
FTCA Claim Filing Process — Step by Step Breakdown of an FTCA Claim...
17.
Source: app.midpage.ai
Title: Mary L. Wardsworth v. United States, 721 F.2d 503
Link:https://app.midpage.ai/document/mary-l-wardsworth-v-united-427337
Source snippet
Mary L. Wardsworth v. United States, 721 F.2d 503...
18.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Cash-Landrum UFO Mystery
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P2HsOUTzyWA
Source snippet
Did Aliens Cause This Family Health Problems? | Cash-Landrum Incident...
19.
Source: openjurist.org
Title: 850 F2d 532 Landreth Ore v. United States | Open Jurist
Link:https://openjurist.org/850/f2d/532
20.
Source: case-law.vlex.com
Title: wardsworth v u s 889940203
Link:https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/wardsworth-v-u-s-889940203
21.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Cash-Landrum UFO Incident
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V757DZ5Xwk
Source snippet
The Cash-Landrum UFO Mystery...
22.
Source: law.resource.org
Title: 803.F2d.1520.85 5923
Link:https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F2/803/803.F2d.1520.85-5923.html
23.
Source: law.resource.org
Title: 907.F2d.246.89 1894
Link:https://law.resource.org/pub/us/case/reporter/F2/907/907.F2d.246.89-1894.html